- The stirring on the mount
- References & Further Reading
- Mount St. Helens: a case against Evolution – The TRUTH SOURCE
- St. Helens used in drive to prove biblical creation with science
Polonium is very unstable, and decays quickly. Some can decay in 3 minutes, some a few days. Po halos are also found in all rocks and in large numbers. How can they be there in large numbers? This conundrum can only be explained if there were one or more rapid changes in U decay rates. The large numbers of these Po halo finds do indicate very quick changes in decay rates and that the rocks cannot be millions and millions of years old.www.balterrainternacional.com/wp-content/2019-10-12/free-gay-chat-detroit-michigan.php
The stirring on the mount
Again, the observable science fits the Creation model and not the uniformitarian model. Carbon 14 or radiocarbon is an entirely different method of dating materials in the earth. It is only used on material that was once alive. Bones, flesh, plants, and any remains that are not entirely fossilized into rock, is what C can be used on. It is only good for a dating back with any confidence to less than 80, years.
This is because C the radioactive parent element has a half life of only 5, years. C is from the atmosphere and part of the food chain. Plants take in as carbon dioxide, the C is the carbon atom, instead of the normal and stable C It is everywhere and all through the food chain, such that all living things as well as the atmosphere, have about the same amount of carbon inside their living tissue. However once a plant or animal dies, it stops ingesting new C Again, radio-carbon dating is only used on samples that were once alive, and is typically good for only ages up to 80, years with any reliability.
It was never used to indicate millions of years of age for fossils or rocks or anything else. Evolutionists never use C on samples they believe to be millions of years old. Yet samples of material analysis of rocks believed to be millions of years old, do contain tiny microscopic fragments of shells, bone, graphite wood and other organic materials.
The compositional analysis of its contents from these studies have been published in many scientific journals. Because of these observations, the RATE Team collected samples of coal Metamorphosed plant remains from deep mines from all over the earth. Each one is thought to be hundreds of millions of years old, and therefore should be C dead. These samples were sent to independent labs for C dating.
Bones of dinosaurs were also dated, as well as petrified wood. In fact, fossil samples from a large spectrum of the fossil record were also tested. Diamonds from deep mines were also tested.
Samples of industrial diamonds from around the world were also tested. This is real observable science. And all of these methods give maximum dates that are that are not in the billions of years and are totally incompatible with evolutionary time spans. In fact, the modern findings of jumbled dinosaur and sea-life graveyards all over the earth, soft tissue in dinosaur bones, as well as the C mentioned above, all make the old-earth age beliefs look very wrong.
Laetoli foot prints in Africa and the Paluxy river footprints in Texas and in the wrong sequences based on evolutionary assumptions. All the many inconsistentcies simply make the million year old age of rocks and strata untenable. And yes, if the obvious conclusion is that there is a Creator and the Bible can be trusted — it does have deep spiritual repercussions.
Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth: DeYoung authored this non-technical book in order to equip the layperson to defend scientific six-day creation and refute modern dating techniques. For more than five years, the RATE team labored examining modern dating techniques and found that these techniques do not support an earth that is billions of years old.
The relevance and processes of helium diffusion, fission tracks, and methods of radioisotope dating are described in a way that the attentive reader can understand. Long before Madam Curie and the invention of radiation detectors.
References & Further Reading
Perhaps you could give more information on this c14 dating of fossils? I could understand if perhaps one or two people are now lost in history so to speak…but I see you also mention there are MANY such examples… which is really lucky because then its obviously well documented what they were, what data came back, who done the analysis and more importantly WHY they ALL done the analysis without question when they all knew c14 is not present in fossils. See heres an example of a creationist paper that can be reviewed and both the raw data, the testing method, the results and absolutely everything can be reviewed … I looked around online on sciencemag, pubmed and other creationist sources and found no such information.
So since you published this article obviously you succeeded to find the information where I failed. There are lots of examples of C14 found in dino bones. The most well known example was in This includes documentation of an Allosaurus bone sample that was sent to The University of Arizona Tucson to be carbon dated.
The result was sample B at 16, years. The Allosaurus dinosaur was supposed to be around ,, years. The samples of bone were blind samples. These and other C14 tests are also referenced in this site: Mickel, seems like you are not familiar with C14 and how it is very different from other forms of radiometric dating. C14 is used on bones and buried plant and firewood samples all the time from anthropological digs. The dino bones were blind samples.
The labs were not told these were Dino bone fragments, but the labs test bones and partially fossilized bones like this all the time. C14 is only good for maximum dates of 80, years or so. But every time someone does test for C14 in Dino bone fragments — its always found. But more importantly you also did not comment on the main points of the article here. Feb 5, 6. Feb 5, 7. I will have to watch the Youtube videos when I get home Blocked here at work I went to a get together put on by my old landlord she was a born again christian and someone there started to talk to me about how the canyons at Mt.
Well, I could not keep to my self and started to explain things to them, the distances between the galaxies and such. After about 5 minutes I was all alone and everyone else was just kind of looking at me funny like I was from another planet or something. So, I will not be attending any more of those kind of gatherings again. Feb 7, 8. Schrodinger's Dog , Feb 7, Feb 7, 9.
- mount st helens as a model for the grand canyon? somehow i don’t think so?
- One thought on “mount st helens as a model for the grand canyon? somehow i don’t think so”.
- Stay Connected!.
- iran dating chat.
- How Old Is the Mount St. Helens Lava Dome?;
I guess it is funny in a way. I'm amazed though at how many non-fundamentalists still don't believe or aren't convinced about evolution I know some who are on the fence, but now don't know because you have creationist "doctors" and "scientists" spreading lies. I watched all of them lol. Feb 7, Gokul , Feb 7, Feb 8, To answer your question this is where many creationist belive: The lava is recirculated over many years.
The actual plates themselves slides slowly into the sea and eventually back into the earth core which they do. Facts and Science against Evolution: Helens is located in Washington State and is said by the U. Helens began to spew ash and steam, marking the first significant eruption in the conterminous United States since … The crown of the ash column rose to about 6, feet above the volcano. PDT, apparently in response to a magnitude 5. Helens suddenly began to collapse, triggering a rapid and tragic train of events that resulted in widespread devastation and the loss of 57 people, including volcanologist Johnston.
Over the course of the day, prevailing winds blew million tons of ash eastward across the United States and caused complete darkness in Spokane, Washington, miles from the volcano… ash fell visibly as far eastward as the Great Plains of the Central United States, more than miles away. The ash cloud spread across the U. Helens erupted with a catastrophic Lateral blast explosion estimated to be the equivalent to about 24 megatons million tons of TNT note: A sonar scan of the bottom of the lake revealed about 19, upright trees on the bottom of the lake.
According to most geologists, petrification rare fossilization process of turning organic material — most often wood — into stone must take place over hundreds of thousands or millions of years.
Mount St. Helens: a case against Evolution – The TRUTH SOURCE
It forms when plant material is buried by sediment and protected from decay due to oxygen and organisms… Petrified Forest National Park… Arizona; about million years ago, this area was a lowland …rivers flooded by tropical rain storms washed mud and other sediments into the lowlands. Enormous coniferous trees up to … feet tall lived and died in these lowlands. Fallen trees… were often buried by the river sediments. Nearby volcanoes erupted numerous times… rapid burial allowed the plant debris to escape destruction by oxygen and insects.
Also, a grand canyon was instantly created at the mountain.
St. Helens used in drive to prove biblical creation with science
At Spirit Lake a study found that logs that had root stumps rapidly up righted themselves and took a vertical position. May , a National Geographic article, on Mount St. Some of the 20 year old trees that were thrown into Spirit Lake in and that had petrified by an August investigation were carbon dated between years old and 36, years old in a study by Karowe and Jefferson.